Menu Contact
Colley Shroyer Abraham
CALL Today Free Consultation 614-678-5072

How does Ohio law treat comparative fault?

If you are old enough to drive a car, then you have lived long enough to likely understand that we do not live in a black-and-white world restricted to either-or or yes-no possibilities. There are many middle-ground possibilities to consider in life, and this grayscale spectrum exists when it comes to determining liability in a multi-car accident.

If you think of negligence law as a spectrum, extreme possibilities exist at the ends and compromise outcomes are what you see toward the middle. The extreme possibility, which is now the law in a minority of states, is referred to as "contributory negligence" and was the law in Ohio until 1980. Under a contributory negligence legal doctrine, if you were involved in an accident with another driver and sued for personal injury or damage to property, then all the other driver would have to do is show that your negligence contributed as little as one percent to the accident and you would be barred from any recovery at all.

Contributory negligence can, and has, led to unjust outcomes in which drivers who were largely responsible for causing harm to others were able to escape accountability simply by proving that the other driver's behavior behind the wheel wasn't perfect. The solution to this extreme doctrine is known as "comparative fault."

Comparative fault systems are variable. Some states use a system that allows relative negligence liability between the parties to be established with exactitude: a jury can decide that the defendant is 85 percent at fault and the plaintiff 15 percent, and any award that the plaintiff receives is reduced by that 15 percent. Pure comparative negligence can, at least in theory, allow a plaintiff who was primarily responsible for the accident to sue and still recover at least something from a defendant who was less at fault.

Ohio's system of comparative fault uses a 50 percent threshold for negligence. That is, if you sue someone else and that person is at least 51 percent at fault, then you can recover damages; but if that ratio is reversed, then the state law precludes you from any recovery at all.

While this post is not meant to be legal advice, if you want to learn more about Ohio negligence law or believe that you have a cause of action, we encourage you to contact a personal injury law firm to learn more.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
contact button

Contact Us For A Free Legal Consultation

To discuss your legal matter with an attorney at our firm, call 614-678-5072 or complete the contact form below.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

  • Rated by super lawyer Daniel N Abraham
  • Rated by super lawyer David I. Shroyer
  • OHIO State Bar Association
  • Columbus Bar Association
  •  The ATLA
  • American Board of Trial Advocates